Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1830/2018

Case between Sanal et al vs Appu Nadar et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-08-02
Duration
Case Code No.
1830
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sanal and others, filed a suit against the defendants, Appu Nadar and Manjusha. The plaintiffs were not ready to adduce evidence, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's failure to adduce evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's failure to adduce evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence, which led to the dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence, which led to the dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted that, the plaintiff has filed IA 4/2025, for removing the case from the list. IA 4/2025 (Application for removing the case from the list) is dismissed vide separate order.

Judgment Evidence:

Since, the plaintiff is not ready to adduce evidence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sanal
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kamal
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vimal
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Appu Nadar
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manjusha
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Vasudevan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Asha T. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is not ready to adduce evidence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won