Case Summary
Samuel Dev, the petitioner, is involved in a rent control petition against Anitha S, the counter petitioner. The court dismissed the petition for default due to the absence of the petitioner and failure to cure the defect in steps.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence and non-compliance with court orders.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the petition for failure to appear.
The court dismissed the petition for failure to appear.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the petition for failure to appear.
The court dismissed the petition for failure to appear.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner absent. No representation. Not cured the defect in steps even though ordered.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Samuel Dev
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anitha S
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dani J. Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Tommy Yesudas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Reshma Ravi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed for default due to lack of representation and failure to cure defects.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2024