Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 254 / 2025

Case between Sajeev. S. vs Suresh et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Smt. SWATHI. R. KRISHNAN
Order Date
2025-07-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sajeev. S. is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against the defendants, Suresh and Aji Suresh. The court has granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing and creating documents related to the plaint schedule property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff against the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted against the defendants
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff against the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court was satisfied by the prima facie case put forth by the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court was satisfied by the prima facie case put forth by the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied by the prima facie case put forth by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence ad-interim injunction is granted and defendants are hereby restrained from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and from creating documents with respect to plaint schedule property until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajeev. S.
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aji Suresh
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o 1st Defendant
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Joy Bhaskar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction is granted and defendants are hereby restrained from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and from creating documents with respect to plaint schedule property until further orders.
Evidence:
this court is satisfied by the prima facie case put forth by the plaintiff is of the view that issuance of notice will defeat the purpose of granting injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajeev. S. vs Suresh et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sajeev. S. vs Suresh et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won