Case Summary
Sajeeena Abdul Salam filed a suit against Sabeena. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed because the plaintiff filed a not press memo.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff did not pursue the case, leading to its dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajeeena Abdul Salam
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sabeena
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Cherunniyoor C.S.Vijayachandran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vishnu.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vaisakh Subodhan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajeeena Abdul Salam vs Sabeena regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between Sajeeena Abdul Salam vs Sabeena regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.