Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 396 / 2025

Case between Sajana vs Laila, Vahid regarding injunction relief.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-11-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sajana, the plaintiff, has filed a petition for an interim injunction against the defendants, Laila and Vahid, concerning property encroachment. The court found that granting the injunction was necessary to prevent irreparable harm to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the petitioner's request for an interim injunction to prevent the defendants from encroaching on the property until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction against the defendants
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the petitioner's request for an interim injunction to prevent the defendants from encroaching on the property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was made out by the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the counter petitioners are restrained from, encroaching into plaint A schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajana
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Laila
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vahid
Party Age
70
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. J. Shihabudheen Kuriyedath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restrained the counter petitioners from encroaching into plaint A schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further orders.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajana vs Laila, Vahid regarding injunction relief.
Case Code Year
Case between Sajana vs Laila, Vahid regarding injunction relief.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won