Case Summary
The case involves plaintiffs Sahirsha.C, Nellikadi Sophia, Nimshu.K.P, Muhammed Musthafa.C, and Anand Sajal seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Bhareesh.O, Shibina.P., Pulparambil Sreeja, Pulparambil Purushothaman, Shibil.P, and Praveen.P. The matter was settled through a joint statement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as per the terms of the joint statement filed by the plaintiffs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter settled through a joint statement.
The matter settled through a joint statement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter settled through a joint statement.
The matter settled through a joint statement.
Supporting Evidence
The court pronounced the matter settled insomuch that it was based on the joint statement filed by the plaintiffs.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed as per terms of Joint statement. Joint statement shall form part of the decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sahirsha.C
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nellikadi Sophia
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nimshu.K.P
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Musthafa.C
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anand Sajal
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bhareesh.O
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shibina.P.
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pulparambil Sreeja
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pulparambil Purushothaman
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shibil.P
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Praveen.P
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.P.Gangadharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sandeep Krishna
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.N.Sujatha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Razal Rahiman
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Jyothi.R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction was requested.
Evidence:
Matter settled. Joint statement filed. Suit dismissed as per terms of Joint statement.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sahirsha.C et al vs Bhareesh.O et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sahirsha.C et al vs Bhareesh.O et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction