Case Summary
This case involves plaintiffs Sahila S. Nair and Adhira S. S against defendants M/S Nirmal Krishna Nidhi Ltd., K. Nirmalan, and The Receiver regarding the rejection of the plaint due to absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation. The court found no application filed and no balance court fee remitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation. The rejection was based on procedural grounds.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of court fees.
The plaint was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of court fees.
The plaint was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The absence of the plaintiff and the lack of representation led to the rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sahila.S.Nair
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Adhira.S.S
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/S Nirmal Krishna Nidhi Ltd.
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K. Nirmalan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Receiver
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R. Sundaresan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kattukad N Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.K. Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected.
Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sahila.S.Nair et al vs M/S Nirmal Krishna Nidhi Ltd. et al regarding plaint rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Sahila.S.Nair et al vs M/S Nirmal Krishna Nidhi Ltd. et al regarding plaint rejection