Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R C P No.35/2025

Case between Sadikha Muhammed Saleem vs P.V.Babijith regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Anjali. P
Order Date
2025-06-25
Duration
approximately-1 year 19 days
Case Closed
Wed, 06/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sadikha Muhammed Saleem, the petitioner, seeks eviction of the respondent, P.V.Babijith, for non-payment of rent and unauthorized subletting. The petitioner claims a bona fide need for the property for running a business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction under several provisions of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The respondent has been ordered to vacate the premises due to non-payment of rent and other grounds.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order of eviction under section 11(2)(b), 11(4)(I), 11(4)(ii), and 11(4)(iii) of the Act.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for eviction under several provisions of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The respondent has been ordered to vacate the premises due to non-payment of rent and other grounds.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated non-payment of rent and required the property for bona fide use.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner demonstrated non-payment of rent and required the property for bona fide use.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 and the documents produced by him stands unchallenged. The PW1 has categorically deposed that the respondent has kept the rent in arrears from September 2024.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1. The rent control petition is allowed under Section 11(2)(b), 11 (4) (I), 11 (4) (ii) and 11 (4) (iii) and section 11(3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sadikha Muhammed Saleem
Party Age
51
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Rafeek Kunhimarath
Party Age
63
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.V.Babijith
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Power of Attorney dated 07.02.2025, Lease agreement dated 01.04.2004, Copy of Lawyer notice dated 11.12.2024, Postal Receipt, Acknowledgment card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. B. Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought an order for the eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
Hence, the petitioner is entitled to an order of eviction under section 11 (4) (i) and section 11 (4) (ii) of the Act as well.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought an order for eviction based on non-payment of rent.
Evidence:
Hence, he is entitled to an order of eviction under section 11 (3) of the Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document legally authorizes the petitioner to act on behalf of the owner in this case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the rental agreement between the petitioner and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the respondent demanding the payment of rent arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves that the lawyer notice was sent to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the receipt of the lawyer notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commissioner's Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report provides evidence of the condition and use of the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commissioner's sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual documentation related to the state of the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Photographs documenting the condition of the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.C1(b) and Ext.C1(c)

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Sadikha Muhammed Saleem vs P.V.Babijith regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Sadikha Muhammed Saleem vs P.V.Babijith regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 06/17/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 06/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between C.Jayaraj Panicker et al vs M.P.Mujeeb Rahman regarding eviction and rent arrears
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Devasya vs V. K.Sasi regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction from shop rooms
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Sabira et al vs Hashim Thangal regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction.
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won