Case Summary
Sadika Matin, the petitioner, filed a rent control petition against Peechingayil Raghuraj, the respondent. The case was dismissed for default as the petitioner was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner absent. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that she has no instruction. Called absent. Petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sadika Matin
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Peechingayil Raghuraj
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Lakshmi. K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Rugmini. K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Petitioner absent. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that she has no instruction. Called absent. Petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sadika Matin vs Peechingayil Raghuraj regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sadika Matin vs Peechingayil Raghuraj regarding Rent Control Petition