Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Rent Control Petition No. 162/2019

Case between Sabitha et al vs V.T. Sunil Kumar regarding eviction

Court
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff - I
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
approximately-6 years 3 months
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners are Sabitha and others seeking eviction of the respondent V.T. Sunil Kumar from the petition schedule shop rooms due to non-payment of rent. The petitioners require the shop rooms for their business operations.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was allowed as the respondent failed to pay the rent and the petitioners had a bona fide requirement for the shop rooms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule room within one month.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for eviction was allowed as the respondent failed to pay the rent and the petitioners had a bona fide requirement for the shop rooms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to prove payment of rent and the petitioners had a legitimate need for the premises.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to prove payment of rent and the petitioners had a legitimate need for the premises.
Supporting Evidence
Thus, it is clear that the rent was in arrears as contented by the petitioners. The respondent has not paid the arrears of rent with interest and notice charge even after the receipt of Ext. A3 notice. Thus, I find that the petitioners are entitled to an order of eviction under section 11(2)(b) of the Act.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed under Secs.11(2)(b) and 11(8) as follows; 1. That the respondent shall put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule room within one month from today, failing which the petitioner can get the order executed through the process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sabitha
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o. Late Sathyapalan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Arun
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o. Late Sathyapalan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajay
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o. Late Sathyapalan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Janu
Party Age
70
Relation
M/o. Late Sathyapalan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.T. Sunil Kumar
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o. Gopalan
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Jenmam Assignment Deed No: 1138/2013, Copy of Registered intimation notice sent by Padanneyil Ayishabi to V.T. Sunil Kumar, Copy of Lawyer notice sent by Adv. Rajesh Odukkathil to V.T. Sunil Kumar, Reply notice sent to Adv. P.P.Surendran to Adv. Rajesh Odukkathil.
Defendants Documents
Copy of notice sent by V.T. Sunil Kumar to Sabitha and others.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajesh Odukkathil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.P. Surendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arjun Pillai
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioners requested eviction of the respondent from the shop rooms.
Evidence:
In view of my findings on the above discussed points, the petition is liable to be allowed under Sec. 11(2)(b) and 11(8) of the Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenmam assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original deed establishing ownership of the building by the petitioners.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Registered intimation notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the respondent informing them of the transfer of tenancy.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice demanding payment of rent arrears and vacating the shop rooms.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response from the respondent disputing the payment of rent arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice sent by the respondent requesting bank details for payment of rent.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Sabitha et al vs V.T. Sunil Kumar regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Sabitha et al vs V.T. Sunil Kumar regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 08/27/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mr.Ferose VP vs Mr.Waseem Thondikodan regarding eviction
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Sasidharan regarding rent control eviction
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Jubairiya et al vs Valiyaveetu Parambil Hamsakoya regarding eviction from leased shop room
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Shoukkathali et al vs Smt.Sumathi regarding eviction under Rent Control Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between O.K.Lasitha vs Janakiyamma.P.P regarding eviction under KBLR Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won