Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.672/2016

Case between S. Vasudevan et al vs Bindu regarding a civil suit

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
Case Code No.
672
Case Closed
Fri, 06/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves S. Vasudevan and his family members as plaintiffs against Bindu as the defendant. The suit was finally heard and a compromise petition was filed, which the court found to be lawful.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise, which was found to be lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise, which was found to be lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the terms of the compromise lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The terms of the same found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of the compromise. The compromise shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S. Vasudevan
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aswathy Vasudevan V.S
Party Age
24
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kaveri Vasudevan V.S
Party Age
19
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindu
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Thonnakkal G.Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sarika Valsan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Kulathoor Rahul L.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Vellarada Rethin.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of the compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2016

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won