Case Summary
S. Sheela filed a petition against V. Anilkumar and Sobhanarani. The court dismissed the petition for default due to the petitioner's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for default due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
The petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
The petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent. No representation. No default in steps cured.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S. Sheela
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V. Anilkumar
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sobhanarani
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.Y Mohan kumar Kiran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition is dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
RCP.NO.
Case Code Year
2025