Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1444/2001

Case between S. Ashokan vs Rajan regarding Execution petition

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt Sreelakshmi C.
Order Date
2025-11-19
Duration
approximately-24 years 10 months
Case Closed
Wed, 11/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

S. Ashokan, the decree holder, sought execution of a decree against Rajan, the judgment debtor. The court found the decree satisfied and ordered additional payment to the advocate commissioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court satisfied the decree and mandated additional payment to the advocate commissioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree Holder shall pay Additional batta of Rs. 5000/- to Advocate commissioner.
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court satisfied the decree and mandated additional payment to the advocate commissioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree was found satisfied as per the commission report.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree was found satisfied as per the commission report.
Supporting Evidence
The court found the decree satisfied as per the commission report filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Decree satisfied.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S. Ashokan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajan
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Commission Report
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.S. Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. G. Sudhakaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree Holder shall pay Additional batta of Rs. 5000/- to Advocate commissioner.
Evidence:
Decree Holder shall pay Additional batta of Rs. 5000/- to Advocate commissioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court considered the commission report filed by the Advocate commissioner in the judgment.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between S. Ashokan vs Rajan regarding Execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between S. Ashokan vs Rajan regarding Execution petition

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2001 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 11/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vellanad Service Co-operative bank Limited 2379, Secretary,Vellanad Service Co-operative Bank Limited 2379, Sasidharan Nair et al vs Manager, Real Industrial Corporation regarding execution petition.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Sree Narayana Smaraka Samithi Trust vs Suresh regarding execution of decree
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Reghupathy et al vs Subi mol M.S regarding execution petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Nalini Harikumar vs Arumukham Pillai regarding eviction
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vivek.S vs Meenambika regarding delivery of vacant possession.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won