Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP.No. 396/2024

Case between Nalini Harikumar vs Arumukham Pillai regarding eviction

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi G.S
Order Date
2025-01-30
Duration
Case Code No.
396
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nalini Harikumar is the decree holder seeking possession of a building from judgment debtor Arumukham Pillai. The court has ordered that the Amin facilitate the delivery of vacant possession by a set date.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has ruled in favor of the decree holder, allowing the Amin to take steps for eviction.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Amin is appointed to effect the delivery by surrendering the vacant possession.
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has ruled in favor of the decree holder, allowing the Amin to take steps for eviction.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder's claim was supported and the judgment debtor was absent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder's claim was supported and the judgment debtor was absent.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the judgment debtor was absent and the decree holder was represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Amin is appointed to effect the delivery by surrendering the vacant possession of the building to the decree holder on or before 27/02/25.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nalini Harikumar
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Parvathy Nair
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arumukham Pillai
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Decree Holder
Advocate Name
Adv. Smt. Ammu Pillai.L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Judgment Debtor
Advocate Name
Adv. Sri. Sakkir Hussain
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Delivery by surrendering the vacant possession of the building to the decree holder
Evidence:
Amin is appointed to effect the delivery by surrendering the vacant possession of the building to the decree holder on or before 27/02/25

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rajeev.S. et al vs Vinod Kumar.B.S. regarding execution proceedings
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M. Premini et al vs Muhammed H Nizarudeen et al regarding Execution of Award
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between M/s South India Surgical Company Ltd vs Sherin A.M et al regarding execution petition
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sarath Babu.MG vs L.Santha et al regarding execution petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd No. T-794 vs Jacob John regarding execution petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won