Case Summary
R.Venkatachalam filed a petition against Sudhadevi.D.R concerning a rent control matter. The case was finally heard and subsequently dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- R.Venkatachalam
- Party Age
- 77
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sudhadevi.D.R
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Anayara Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sainu Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Pinki Jayan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.Premjith Palazhy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition was dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2024