Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1679/2023

Case between R.S. Raj Mathew et al vs Kochitti Abraham et al regarding suit dismissal.

Court
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-06-16
Duration
Case Code No.
1679
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves R.S. Raj Mathew and Bincy Mathew as plaintiffs against Kochitti Abraham and Susan Abraham Manappurathu as defendants. The court dismissed the suit as abandoned due to the absence of both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as abandoned due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as abandoned due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendant.
Key Reasoning:
Defendant was not present, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Defendant was not present, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant absent. No representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as abandoned.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
R.S. Raj Mathew
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bincy Mathew
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kochitti Abraham
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Susan Abraham Manappurathu
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sanal Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Sophia Easo
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Arun S Sasi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Jayachandran.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as abandoned.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as abandoned.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won