Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 310/ 2025

Case between Roshan. C. vs Sofi. B.R. et al regarding injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Roshan. C. is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Sofi. B.R. and Raheema regarding the plaint schedule property. The court found that a prima facie case was made out and that failure to grant the injunction would cause irreparable injury.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the petitioner, restraining the respondents from encroaching into the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the petitioner, restraining the respondents from encroaching into the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the counter petitioners are restrained from encroaching into plaint schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Roshan. C.
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sofi. B.R.
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raheema
Party Age
69
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sainaba Koya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining counter petitioners from encroaching into plaint schedule property and committing any act of waste therein
Evidence:
the counter petitioners are restrained from encroaching into plaint schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Roshan. C. vs Sofi. B.R. et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Roshan. C. vs Sofi. B.R. et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won