Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.437/2023

Case between Rohini Lease and General Financiers vs Seetha Lakshmi et al regarding loan repayment.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.ANJALI.P
Order Date
2025-06-20
Duration
approximately-8 years 0 days
Case Closed
Fri, 06/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rohini Lease and General Financiers is a registered partnership firm providing loans. The defendants defaulted on repayment of a sanctioned loan amount of Rs.50,000/- and have only repaid Rs.20,000/-.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff's suit for loan repayment is decreed, allowing them to recover dues from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff shall be entitled to realise Rs.79,978/- with interest at the rate of 9 per cent from date of suit till date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's suit for loan repayment is decreed, allowing them to recover dues from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The agreement clearly stated the repayment terms and the defendants' defaults.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The agreement clearly stated the repayment terms and the defendants' defaults.
Supporting Evidence
The PW1 has categorically deposed regarding the transaction between himself and the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaintiff shall be entitled to realise Rs.79,978/- from the defendant with interest at the rate of 9 per cent from date of suit till date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6 per cent from the date of decree till date of realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rohini Lease and General Financiers
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Seetha Lakshmi.M
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anitha
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of loan application, Certified copy agreement executed between plaintiff and Defendant, Attested copy of loan account ledger of Defendant, Debt acknowledgment original executed by defendant to plaintiff, Copy of Lawyer notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Shyju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff shall be entitled to realise Rs.79,978/- from the defendant with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaintiff shall be entitled to realise Rs.79,978/- (Rupees seventy nine thousand nine hundred and seventy eight only) from the defendant with interest at the rate of 9 per cent from date of suit till date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6 per cent from the date of decree till date of realisation.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
2. The defendant shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the loan application submitted by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy agreement executed between plaintiff and Defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Key piece of evidence outlining the terms of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Attested copy of loan account ledger of Defendant (Photocopy)
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided details on the loan account status and payments made by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Debt acknowledgment original executed by defendant to plaintiff
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated the defendant's acknowledgment of the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Debt acknowledgment original executed by defendant to plaintiff
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of the defendant's acknowledgment of the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed that the plaintiff had sent notice to the defendants regarding the dues.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the delivery of the lawyer's notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the delivery of subsequent communication.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Un served Postal cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicated that a notice was sent but not received by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served as proof of receipt of communication by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Certified copy of True extract of Register of firms issue
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided verification of the plaintiff's registration as a firm.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Certified Copy of Licence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated the legal standing of the plaintiff to issue loans.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Rohini Lease and General Financiers vs Seetha Lakshmi et al regarding loan repayment.
Case Code Year
Case between Rohini Lease and General Financiers vs Seetha Lakshmi et al regarding loan repayment.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 05/30/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/S.UCO Bank vs Mrs.Surya Bindu.U.C et al regarding loan recovery.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajesh vs Shahida.T.K regarding realisation of amount.
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Classic Pipes Syndicate vs Mr.Thurasserikandi Meethal Ajeesh regarding realization of money
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.P.Vasudevan vs Areekkal Sunil Kumar et al regarding realisation of advance money
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs BABEESH.K et al regarding realisation of amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won