Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 494/2022

Case between M/S.UCO Bank vs Mrs.Surya Bindu.U.C et al regarding loan recovery.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.MEERA JOHN.K
Order Date
2025-04-04
Duration
approximately-6 years 1 month
Case Closed
Fri, 04/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves M/S.UCO Bank and defendants Mrs.Surya Bindu.U.C and Mr.Sasidharan.T regarding a loan granted for purchasing Milch animals. The defendants defaulted on the repayment of the loan, leading to this suit filed by the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs.8,16,097 along with future interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.8,16,097 with future interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs.8,16,097 along with future interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved their case through unchallenged evidence and documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved their case through unchallenged evidence and documents.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 and the documents produced by him remains unchallenged. As such, I find that the plaintiff had proved his case and is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: 1)The defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.8,16,097 (Rupees eight lakhs sixteen thousand and ninety seven only) with future interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/S.UCO Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs.Surya Bindu.U.C
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Sasidharan.T
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Original Deed of hypothecation cum agreement for agricultural loan, Original acknowledgment of liability, Sanction Letter, Original letter of guarantee, Copy of the recalling notice, Certified copy of the statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.A.Gireesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manju N.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.T.P. Jayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay the loan amount along with future interest and costs.
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.8,16,097- (Rupees eight lakhs sixteen thousand and ninety seven only) with future interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as part of the evidence proving the loan application for purchasing Milch animals.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Hypothecation cum Agreement for Agricultural Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the terms of the loan sanctioned, evidencing the agreement between the plaintiff and the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as acknowledgment by the defendants of their liability towards the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter confirms the sanction of the loan amount to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a guarantee executed by the second defendant to secure the loan taken by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of the Recalling Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued by the plaintiff to recall the loan after default in payments.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts are part of the evidence concerning the sending of the recalling notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6(a)
Document Type: Certified Copy of the Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides an account statement that evidences the payment history and outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/S.UCO Bank vs Mrs.Surya Bindu.U.C et al regarding loan recovery.
Case Code Year
Case between M/S.UCO Bank vs Mrs.Surya Bindu.U.C et al regarding loan recovery.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 02/25/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 04/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s. Prabija Boutique regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Muthiyeri Bankers vs Jaseera.M.V regarding rejection of plaint
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs BABEESH.K et al regarding realisation of amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited vs Al Shahal K.M. et al regarding suit dismissal for non-representation.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Vijaya Bank vs Mr. Thanseer et al regarding realization of an amount due from defendants.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won