Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P.No.6/2024

Case between Renjith Chandrasekara Pillai et al vs A. Sekhar et al regarding Rent Control issues

Court
IN THE COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
Case Code No.
6
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Renjith Chandrasekara Pillai and Prasanna Kumari R filed a petition against A. Sekhar and S. Vasudevan regarding a rental dispute. The court found that the petition was dismissed as satisfied.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition as satisfied after the plaintiff's counsel stated that the key of the petition schedule building was received.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as satisfied after the plaintiff's counsel stated that the key of the petition schedule building was received.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is dismissed as satisfied.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Renjith Chandrasekara Pillai
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prasanna Kumari R
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A. Sekhar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S. Vasudevan
Party Age
65
Plaintiffs Documents
Memo regarding the key of the petition schedule building
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. N. Gopalakrishnan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Arun.I.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Jomy.J.M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Aravind.T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.S.Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Aarcha.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition is dismissed as satisfied.
Evidence:
Counsel for petitioner filed memo stating that key of Plaint Schedule Building received. Hence petition is dismissed as satisfied.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between B.Vijayan vs Shabnam Aslam regarding petition dismissal
IN THE COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Nisha vs P.Ramesan regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Noorul Islamic Educational Trust(NIET) vs M/s Acumen Global Private Limited et al regarding a petition.
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Barbara Thomas vs Sonia Benny regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won