Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1605/2022

Case between Ravikrishnan N.R vs Secretary, Alappuzha Municipality regarding a civil suit

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-21
Duration
Case Code No.
1605
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ravikrishnan N.R filed a suit against the Secretary and Alappuzha Municipality. The court ruled that the plaint is rejected due to a lack of remitted court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff's plaint was rejected by the court due to no balance court fee being remitted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's plaint was rejected by the court due to no balance court fee being remitted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to lack of court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to lack of court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to lack of court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ravikrishnan N.R
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Secretary, Alappuzha Municipality
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alappuzha Municipality
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Suneeth.S.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Azad Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.A.Udaya Rekha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaint is rejected.
Evidence:
the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Municipality

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Muncipal Corporation Workers and Employees Congress vs N.Sreekantan, Mukunda Devan Nair et al regarding dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sandeep. N vs Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation et al regarding withdrawal of suit
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K. Somasekhara Pillai vs Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Palm World Manufacturing Unit vs The Secretary, Muncipal Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding suit dismissal for default
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won