Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1442.2021

Case between Raveendran vs Sreedevi et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-06-04
Duration
approximately-4 years 21 days
Case Closed
Wed, 06/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Raveendran as the plaintiff and Sreedevi and Vasanthakumari as defendants. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was continuously absent and did not make any representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear or represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear or represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
As plaintiff as continuously absent and no representation was made one side of plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raveendran
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreedevi
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vasanthakumari
Party Age
63
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Anil Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sreekanth.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Anoop Krishna.B.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Anjana.C.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Vinoj Rajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Sreeja S. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Aparna M. Rajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Bindhu.V.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence I find no reason to proceed with the suit. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raveendran vs Sreedevi et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence
Case Code Year
Case between Raveendran vs Sreedevi et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 06/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won