Case Summary
The plaintiffs Rakhi and Sasikala filed a suit against the defendant Anu.J. The case was ultimately dismissed for default due to non-representation of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as none of the plaintiffs represented themselves in court and no steps were taken for further proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear and take necessary steps for their case.
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear and take necessary steps for their case.
Why Defendant Won:
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear and take necessary steps for their case.
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear and take necessary steps for their case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs were not represented, leading to the court's decision to dismiss the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rakhi
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sasikala
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anu.J
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. T.Raja Raja Singh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rakhi et al vs Anu.J regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Rakhi et al vs Anu.J regarding dismissal for default