Case Summary
R. Meena Devi, the petitioner, and K.P. Saxon, the counter petitioner, were involved in a rent control case. The petitioner requested the court to address housing issues but later filed a not pressed memo.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Case
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petitioner is dismissed as not pressed. pronounced in the open court on this the 18th day of August, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- R. Meena Devi
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.P. Saxon
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Court fee - 10.00, Legal Benefit Fund-100.00, Vakalath fee - 6.00, Document Fee - 2.00, Petition fee - 30.00
Defendants Documents
Vakalath fee - 6.00, Document Fee - 5.00, Petition fee - 5.00
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A. Santhosh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Riaz. S. Kandala
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Manju.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Malayinkeezhu Ajith N.G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petitioner is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence petitioner is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2023