Case Summary
Pushpa Leela has filed a suit against Sukumari.C. and Jessy.Y. seeking an ad-interim injunction. The case involves a dispute over the peaceful use of a pathway adjoining the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from committing waste and blocking the pathway
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's use of the pathway.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit, prompting the court to act swiftly.
The delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit, prompting the court to act swiftly.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from planting plaintains, trees or committing waste in the plaint D schedule pathway in order to block or closed down the pathway and in anyway not to interfere the peaceful ingress and egress to the plaint A schedule property by the plaintiff until 23.08.2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pushpa Leela
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sukumari.C.
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jessy.Y.
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Renjith.C.Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Julie.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Preethi Mani.T.K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's access to the property.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from planting plaintains, trees or committing waste in the plaint D schedule pathway in order to block or closed down the pathway and in any way not to interfere the peaceful ingress and egress to the plaint A schedule property by the plaintiff until 23.08.2025.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pushpa Leela vs Sukumari.C., Jessy.Y. regarding ad-interim injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Pushpa Leela vs Sukumari.C., Jessy.Y. regarding ad-interim injunction