Case Summary
Punjab National Bank, represented by Smt. Preetha. M.A, filed a case against Safvana. T and others. The plaintiff did not press the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff did not press the suit, resulting in its dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Smt. Preetha. M.A
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- D/o M.D. Appan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Safvana. T
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- D/o Sakkeer
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nadira. T. K
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o Sakeer. T
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sakkeer. T
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o Abdul Khader
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Manoj. N
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sudheesh. M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not pressed the suit. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Punjab National Bank, Govindapuram Branch vs Safvana. T et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Punjab National Bank, Govindapuram Branch vs Safvana. T et al regarding dismissal of suit