Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1019/2025

Case between Prasanth.B et al vs Gireesh kumar.C et al regarding furnishing security for a counter petition

Court
COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
Case Code No.
1019
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Prasanth.B and Designer Group are the plaintiffs, and Gireesh kumar.C and Deepthi.T.O are the defendants. The case involves a petition for security against the defendants regarding the disposal of property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court directed the defendants to furnish security or show cause why they should not do so. Additionally, the property in question was conditionally attached.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The counter petitioners/defendants are directed to furnish security for the sum of Rs. 5,75,270/-.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court directed the defendants to furnish security or show cause why they should not do so. Additionally, the property in question was conditionally attached.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners/plaintiffs made out a prima facie case and demonstrated intent by the defendants to obstruct the execution of a decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner/plaintiffs have made out a prima facie case and I am satisfied that the counter petitioners/defendants with intent to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree that may be passed against them is about to dispose of the petition schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the counter petitioners/defendants are directed either to furnish security for the sum of Rs. 5,75,270/- (Rupees Five lakhs Seventy five thousand two hundred and seventy only) or to appear and show cause why they should not furnish security.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prasanth.B
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Designer Group
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gireesh kumar.C
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepthi.T.O
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.A.G. Syamkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Counter petitioners/defendants are directed to either furnish security or appear and show cause regarding the security for the sum of Rs. 5,75,270/-.
Evidence:
the counter petitioners/defendants are directed either to furnish security for the sum of Rs. 5,75,270/- (Rupees Five lakhs Seventy five thousand two hundred and seventy only) or to appear and show cause why they should not furnish security.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won