Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 42/2025

Case between Prasanna vs Rani Gurudas et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P
Order Date
2025-01-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Prasanna is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against the defendants, Rani Gurudas, Sumarajan, and Sujatha. The case involves a petition for restraining the defendants from blocking a pathway vital to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff, prohibiting the defendants from blocking a crucial pathway.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restrained the respondents from blocking the pathway and preventing the petitioner from using it until further order.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff, prohibiting the defendants from blocking a crucial pathway.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case is made out and irreparable injury to the petitioner would occur without the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case is made out and irreparable injury to the petitioner would occur without the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from blocking the petition B schedule pathway and further restrained from preventing the petitioner from using petition B schedule pathway until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prasanna
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rani Gurudas
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sumarajan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujatha
Party Age
75
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. D. Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondents are restrained from blocking the petition B schedule pathway and further restrained from preventing the petitioner from using petition B schedule pathway until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prasanna vs Rani Gurudas et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Prasanna vs Rani Gurudas et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won