Case Summary
Prasanna is the petitioner seeking relief against Madathil Amina in a rent control petition. The court has allowed the interim application.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The interim application has been allowed by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
IA allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasanna
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Madathil Amina
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.B.Sahasranaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Padmaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
IA allowed.
Evidence:
Both parties represented. Costs paid. Hence, IA allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
RPIA
Case Code Year
2025