Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RPIA 119/2024

Case between Muhammed Ashraf vs Ashraf et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff - I
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-02-27
Duration
approximately-0 years 7 months
Case Code No.
119
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed Ashraf filed a petition to set aside an exparte order passed against him in a Rent Control Petition. He claimed illness prevented him from appearing in court, while the respondents argued the petition was an attempt to delay proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition to set aside the exparte order was allowed on the condition of depositing costs. The court recognized the petitioner's argument regarding his illness.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Opportunity to dispose of the suit provided costs are deposited.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition to set aside the exparte order was allowed on the condition of depositing costs. The court recognized the petitioner's argument regarding his illness.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner was prevented from attending court due to valid medical reasons.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner was prevented from attending court due to valid medical reasons.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the reason shown in the application is sufficient to allow this application.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed on condition to deposit costs of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only) to the petitioner within 14 days, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Ashraf
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashraf
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sikanthar
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Medical certificates showing illness.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. K.M. Musthafa
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Sri. K.M. Muhammed Iqbal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed on condition to deposit costs of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only) to the petitioner within 14 days.
Evidence:
In view of the above discussed aspects, I am satisfied that the reason shown in the application is sufficient to allow this application.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Sufficient cause for absence
Case Code
RPIA
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 02/27/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Prasanna vs Madathil Amina regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER/ PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between S.J.Jose vs Moideen Koya Kavungal regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER /PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheela vs The Chevayur Service Co operative Bank Ltd regarding rent control petition.
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Shoukath Ali et al vs Sunandakumari et al regarding Rent Control Petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Nanditha Sreekumar vs Nadira Bhanu K. regarding rent control petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won