Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.788/2019

Case between Pradeep Kumar.C.L. vs Vijayakumari regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-i
Judge
Sri. Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-12-16
Duration
approximately-6 years 11 months
Case Code No.
788
Case Closed
Tue, 12/16/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Pradeep Kumar.C.L., is seeking the recovery of Rs.8,16,043/- from the defendant, Vijayakumari, after a cheque issued by the defendant was dishonoured. The defendant denies borrowing the money and claims the suit is based on forged documents.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court found sufficient evidence proving the defendant borrowed money and failed to repay as agreed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.8,16,043/- with interest at 9% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court found sufficient evidence proving the defendant borrowed money and failed to repay as agreed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was convincing and went unchallenged by the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was convincing and went unchallenged by the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The uncontroverted averments in the plaint and the facts sworn in the affidavit coupled with the accompanying documents go on to prove that the defendant has borrowed temporary loan from the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs: The Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.8,16,043/- (Rupees Eight lakhs sixteen thousand and forty three only) with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pradeep Kumar.C.L.
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayakumari
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original cheque bearing No.087250, Cheque dishonour memo
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
RI. G.S.Sanal Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.8,16,043/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs: Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.8,16,043/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant and her assets both movable and immovable.
Evidence:
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant and her assets both movable and immovable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original cheque bearing No.087250 for an amount of Rs.8,00,000/- was issued by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque dishonour memo dated 16/04/2019 indicated that the cheque was dishonoured due to 'Funds Insufficient'.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 01/09/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 12/16/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rajan.M vs M/s.Thanima Marbles et al regarding recovery of money
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between R.R.V. Sanal Kumar vs G Praveen Gopal regarding recovery of money
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between B.Saji Kumar vs Rosechandran regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- II
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Padmaja Mohan. D vs Shahina.S regarding Recovery of money
I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Universal Pharma vs Vijaya kumar.K regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won