Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P 126/2020

Case between P.P. Alikoya vs M/s. Muthoot Fincorp Ltd regarding possession of property

Court
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Jomy Anu Isaac
Order Date
2025-01-24
Duration
approximately-4 years 14 days
Case Code No.
126
Case Closed
Fri, 01/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.P. Alikoya filed a petition against M/s. Muthoot Fincorp Ltd for possession of a property due to failure to submit a counter statement. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, reviving a previous order due to the respondent's non-compliance.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Possession of the petition schedule property
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to submit the counter statement within the prescribed time limit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to submit the counter statement within the prescribed time limit.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent didn't file counter in IA 7/21 till today. The time limit prescribed by Appellate Authority expired on 11/12/24 and thus the order of this court dated 16/03/2022 stands revived.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property with immediate effect.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.P. Alikoya
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Muthoot Fincorp Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Lakshmi.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rugmini.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sabu John Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property with immediate effect.
Evidence:
Hence the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property with immediate effect.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 01/10/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Puthukkudy Abdurahiman vs Opal Hotal regarding arrears of rent and eviction.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mrs. Parvathy Rabindranathan et al vs Hassan.K et al regarding eviction of tenants
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Devasya vs V. K.Sasi regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction from shop rooms
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction.
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won