Case Summary
Poovajintakath Thahseena is the petitioner in this eviction petition against Ragil and Rahul. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the decree holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Eviction Petition
Final Judgment
No
The eviction petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the decree holder was absent and did not provide representation.
The court found that the decree holder was absent and did not provide representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the decree holder was absent and did not provide representation.
The court found that the decree holder was absent and did not provide representation.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Poovajintakath Thahseena
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ragil
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rahul
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.K Lakshmi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Eviction Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P.
Case Code Year
2023