Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P.426/2023

Case between Abdul Samad vs Amaravathy et al regarding eviction petition.

Court
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Judge
Sri.Vivek.P
Order Date
2025-03-12
Duration
Case Code No.
426
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Samad, represented by his attorney, filed an eviction petition against Amaravathy and her daughters. The court heard the case regarding the compliance with the earlier order and the revival of the eviction petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court closed the eviction petition for the time being, allowing the decree holder to revive it later if necessary.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Eviction Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the eviction petition for the time being, allowing the decree holder to revive it later if necessary.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

EP closed for the time being with liberty given to Decree Holder to revive EP as and when stay is vacated or when Judgment Debtor defaults in complying with the condition stipulated in the order of the Hon’ble Court.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Samad
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Amaravathy
Party Age
74
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anitha
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunitha
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vineetha
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.S.Ramalingam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.P.Gangadharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Closed
Description:
E.P. closed for the time being with liberty given to Decree Holder to revive E.P. as and when stay is vacated or when Judgment Debtor defaults in complying with the condition stipulated in the order.
Evidence:
EP closed for the time being with liberty given to Decree Holder to revive EP as and when stay is vacated or when Judgment Debtor defaults in complying with the condition stipulated in the order of the Hon’ble Court.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Eviction Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Illikkal Abdul Kareem vs Peranthodi Prajosh regarding possession of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between BB Fareeda vs P Manoharan regarding eviction petition.
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Eviction Petition Unknown
Case between Janaki et al vs Koratholi Nanu et al regarding settlement of eviction petition.
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Eviction Petition Defendant Won
Case between Bhaskaran vs Sivadasan regarding eviction petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Eviction Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Poovajintakath Thahseena vs Ragil et al regarding default dismissal
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Eviction Petition Defendant Won