Case Summary
Pallippuram Traders represented by E.Shajahan filed a restoration petition. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the restoration petition.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pallippuram Traders
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sudheerkhan.S.
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulfath Beevi
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S. Leena
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thattathumala.S.Anilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence the petition dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pallippuram Traders et al vs Sudheerkhan.S., Sulfath Beevi regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Pallippuram Traders et al vs Sudheerkhan.S., Sulfath Beevi regarding restoration petition