Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 290/2015

Case between Palakkunnath Saidali vs Kodakkadu Abdul Majeed et al regarding perpetual injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2015-12-23
Duration
5 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff filed suit seeking perpetual injunction to prevent defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property, demolishing the compound wall, or interfering with possession and enjoyment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted perpetual injunction restraining defendants from trespassing, demolishing the compound wall, or interfering with plaintiff's possession of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to prove ownership and entitlement to the relief.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff adduced cogent and reliable evidence to prove his case. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree as prayed for.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Palakkunnath Saidali (57 years) Thrinnavaya amsom, Desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 301

Defendants

Kodakkadu Abdul Majeed (50 years) Thirunnavaya amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 301 Kodakkad Faisal (30 years) Thirunnavaya amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 301 Thekkepurath Shareef @ Muthu (30 years) Thirunnavaya amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 301 Alungai Parambil Sanup @ Kuttan (27 years) Thirunnavaya amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Perpetual Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restrain defendants from trespassing, demolishing compound wall, or interfering with possession and enjoyment of property.
Evidence:
The plaintiff adduced cogent and reliable evidence to prove entitlement to the relief.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the cost of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1 : 02-07-1990
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report submitted by Advocate Commissioner after inspection of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
C1 : 19-9-2015
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch of the property submitted by Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
C2 : 19-9-2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 12/19/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases