Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 249 OF 2014

Case between Avarukunnan Abid et al vs Naduthodi Aboobakkar et al regarding perpetual injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A LL.B.
Order Date
2017-03-29
Duration
2 years 11 months 10 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs sought permanent injunction against defendants for removing plantations from the plaint schedule property and interfering with peaceful possession.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a perpetual injunction restraining defendants from trespassing, interfering with, or committing waste on the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Perpetual Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs provided cogent and reliable evidence including Ext.A1, Ext.C1, C2, C3, and C4 to prove their exclusive possession and entitlement to relief.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: The defendants and their men are restrained by a perpetual injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule or from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiffs or from committing waste in the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Avarukunnan Abid (35 years) Melmuri amsom, Karakkad desom, Tirur Taluk Kunduvayil Sameera (29 years) Melmuri amsom, Karakkad desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Naduthodi Aboobakkar (45 years) Melmuri amsom, Karakkad desom, Tirur Taluk Naduthodi Amina (76 years) Melmuri amsom, Karakkad desom, Tirur Taluk Safiya (35 years) Melmuri amsom, Karakkad desom, Tirur Taluk Muhammadali Nellikkal (36 years) Melmuri amsom, Karakkad desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Perpetual Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining defendants from trespassing, interfering, or committing waste on the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The defendants and their men are restrained by a perpetual injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule or from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiffs or from committing waste in the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Defendants to pay the costs of the suit.
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Jenam Assignment Deed
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of tax payment
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report showing visible signs of alleged activities
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court exhibit plan of the property
Reference:
C2
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report validating identity of plaint schedule property
Reference:
C3
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Plan showing identification of the property
Reference:
C4

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 03/29/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases