Case Summary
The case involves N.Vinod Kumar and N.Shanod as plaintiffs against Vanajakshi and others as defendants. The suit was filed for the fixation of boundary.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N.Vinod Kumar
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N.Shanod
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vanajakshi
- Party Age
- 86
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pachatt Rajani
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pachatt Udayabanu
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pachatt Vinod Kumar
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Rajeev Lakzman.P.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Abhilash.K.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N.Vinod Kumar et al vs Vanajakshi et al regarding fixation of boundary.
Case Code Year
Case between N.Vinod Kumar et al vs Vanajakshi et al regarding fixation of boundary.