Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.259/2022

Case between Nizamudheen vs Sabeen Khader regarding impounding a mortgage deed

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-09-23
Duration
approximately-3 years 4 months
Case Code No.
259
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Nizamudheen, the defendant, who has filed a petition to impound a mortgage deed dated 08.04.2021, claiming it is insufficiently stamped. Sabeen Khader, the plaintiff, is contesting this claim and asserting her rights over the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the petitioner, allowing the application to impound the mortgage deed due to insufficient stamping. The defendant is required to pay the deficient stamp duty with a penalty.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The counter petitioner/plaintiff/counter claim defendant is directed to pay 20 times of the deficient stamp duty plus the deficient stamp duty for the above said document within 10 days.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the petitioner, allowing the application to impound the mortgage deed due to insufficient stamping. The defendant is required to pay the deficient stamp duty with a penalty.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The document was found to be insufficiently stamped as per the provisions of the Kerala Stamp Act.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The document dated 08.04.2021 styled as mortgage deed is insufficiently stamped and it requires stamp duty as per Article 37 r/w Article 21 of the schedule of Kerala Stamp Act, 1959.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed directing the counter petitioner/plaintiff/ counter claim defendant to pay 20 times of the deficient stamp duty plus the deficient stamp duty for the above said document as per Article 37 of Schedule of Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 within 10 days from the date of the order before the office of this court failing which the said document shall be forwarded to the collector.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sabeen Khader
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nizamudheen
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Mortgage deed dated 08.04.2021
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Abdul Kharim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.S. Satheesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court allowed the petition to impound the insufficiently stamped mortgage deed.
Evidence:
Hence, Point No. 1 is found in favor of the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mortgage Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was presented by the plaintiff as evidence and identified as insufficiently stamped.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Dispute over mortgage deed validity
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 05/23/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won