Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OP (Succession) No.21/2023

Case between Nirmala Kumari.K.V et al vs null regarding Succession

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, led by Nirmala Kumari.K.V, sought succession rights. However, the petitioner was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed for default as the petitioner was absent and unrepresented during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Succession
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default as the petitioner was absent and unrepresented during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner was absent and did not represent themselves.
Why Defendant Won:
Petitioner was absent and did not represent themselves.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner is absent and there was no representation during the hearing.

Judgment Evidence:

The case was called several times. Since, the petitioner is neither present nor represented, the petitioner is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nirmala Kumari.K.V
Party Age
73
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheela Ramani
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sasikala K V
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suchithra.K.V.
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudarsan.K.V
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Kovalam B Sukesan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Lekshmy I
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner.
Evidence:
Since, the petitioner is neither present nor represented, the petitioner is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Succession
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nirmala Kumari.K.V et al vs null regarding Succession
Case Code Year
Case between Nirmala Kumari.K.V et al vs null regarding Succession

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Dr. K.P.Jhansi @ K. Philomina Jhansi vs Nil regarding Succession.
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Succession Defendant Won
Case between Reena Beegam et al vs Nil regarding issuance of succession certificate
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Succession Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayaprabha S J vs null regarding succession certificate
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Succession Plaintiff Won
Case between U.Kasturi Raj et al vs null regarding succession certificate
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Succession Plaintiff Won
Case between Freeda vs Vincent et al regarding succession
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Succession Defendant Won