OP ( Succession ) No.16/2023

Case between Freeda vs Vincent et al regarding succession

Court

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF

Judge

Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S

Order Date

2025-02-15

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Freeda and Metilda petitioned for a succession case. The counter petitioners include Vincent and others.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Succession

Final Judgment

The petition was dismissed because the petitioner was absent with no representation or steps taken.

Key Reasoning:
Petitioner was not present and did not take any action on the petition.

Why Defendant Won:
Petitioner was not present and did not take any action on the petition.

Supporting Evidence

Petitioner absent, no representation. No steps seen taken till date.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Freeda
Party Age: 42
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Metilda
Party Age: 54
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Vincent
Party Age: 60
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Maria Dasan
Party Age: 58

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Nancy
Party Age: 50
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Thadayus
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Esthaki
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Sajad Muhammed
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K. Priyakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. S.A. Sundar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Petition dismissed for default due to petitioner's absence and no representation.

Evidence: