Case Summary
The case involves a lawsuit filed by Nirmal against Noufal. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent, and the court dismissed the suit for default due to the lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default. No Costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nirmal
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Noufal
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.S.Santhy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.R.Santhosh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Kovalam B Ajith Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Vimalanandhan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018