Case Summary
The plaintiff, Nandakumar.B, filed a suit against defendant Ushakumari. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.
The plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.
The plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is neither present nor represented.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nandakumar.B
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ushakumari
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sankarlal B.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Rajesh Raveendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023