Case Summary
Nabeesa. M, a petitioner, filed a rent control petition against Sanal, the respondent. The matter was settled and the petition was dismissed as not pressed by the counsel for the petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was settled and subsequently dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence RCP is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nabeesa. M
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sanal
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N. Jalaludheen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. P.M. Athira
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition is not pressed by the counsel for the petitioner.
Evidence:
Matter settled. Petition is not pressed by the counsel for the petitioner. Hence RCP is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Matter settled
Case Code
Case between Nabeesa. M vs Sanal regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Nabeesa. M vs Sanal regarding Rent Control Petition