Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 282/2018

Case between N. Vittal Das et al vs Balakrishnan Mallarkandi et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-02-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are N. Vittal Das and Geetha V. Shenayi, while the defendants are Balakrishnan Mallarkandi, Govindaraj Mallarkandy, and Juvalesh Mallarkandy. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and no representation from defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default as there was no representation from the plaintiffs and defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default as there was no representation from the plaintiffs and defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default. All interim orders stand dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N. Vittal Das
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha V. Shenayi
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Balakrishnan Mallarkandi
Party Age
79
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Govindaraj Mallarkandy
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Juvalesh Mallarkandy
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Jayaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E. R. Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. E.M. Vijayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
All interim orders stand dismissed.
Evidence:
All interim orders stand dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N. Vittal Das et al vs Balakrishnan Mallarkandi et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between N. Vittal Das et al vs Balakrishnan Mallarkandi et al regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vilasini Manammal vs Shyma et al regarding eviction and compensation for unauthorised use and occupation.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE.
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Kalyan Engineering Corporation vs M/s. Mawsim Gold Private Ltd. regarding mediation agreement
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meenakshi vs Radha K.A. et al regarding mediation agreement
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank, Kakkodi Branch, et al vs Sanith P., Somasundaran M. regarding settlement of dispute.
The Court of the Additional Munsiff-I, Kozhikode
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Peradi Puthukudi Padmini Amma et al vs Kolappalli Kolasseri Abdulla regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Dismissed