Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.309/2018

Case between N. Kuttappan et al vs Damodaran @ Wilson et al regarding final decree proceedings

Court
Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-03-24
Duration
approximately-6 years 2 months
Case Closed
Mon, 03/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including N. Kuttappan and K.Ravikumar, are in a legal dispute with the defendants led by Damodaran regarding the final decree proceedings. The case was finally heard on March 24, 2025.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The preliminary decree had already been passed, but no steps were taken for final decree proceedings. The final decree application was dismissed due to the party not turning up.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The preliminary decree had already been passed, but no steps were taken for final decree proceedings. The final decree application was dismissed due to the party not turning up.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence final decree application dismissed. Pronounced in the open court on this the 24th day of March 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N. Kuttappan
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Ravikumar alias Raveendran
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Sasikumar alias Sasi
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subha
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Glory
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Damodaran @ Wilson
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha
Party Age
70
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leela
Party Age
72
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sugandhy
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Punchakkari M. Prabhakaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Ayyappan Pillai
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Satheesh Babu.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Final decree application dismissed due to no steps taken.
Evidence:
Hence final decree application dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N. Kuttappan et al vs Damodaran @ Wilson et al regarding final decree proceedings
Case Code Year
Case between N. Kuttappan et al vs Damodaran @ Wilson et al regarding final decree proceedings

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 03/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won