Case Summary
The plaintiff, Muralee Krishnan, was absent during the hearing, while the defendant, Noushad.A.R, was represented. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed due to their absence during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was absent and presented no representation.
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was absent and presented no representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was absent and presented no representation.
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was absent and presented no representation.
Supporting Evidence
As plaintiff is absent no representation is made in listed matter.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muralee Krishnan
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Noushad.A.R
- Party Age
- 60
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Deepak.J.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Dhanya.U.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vishnu Hari.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Shameem.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Basant.L.J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Chippy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Jyothilekshmi.B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. R.S. Abhirami
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Gayathri Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Karthika R. Nath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Athira Chandran.U.B.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A.G.Girish kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Veena.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
As plaintiff is absent no representation is made in listed matter. Suit stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muralee Krishnan vs Noushad.A.R regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Muralee Krishnan vs Noushad.A.R regarding dismissal of suit