Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.181/2021

Case between Mujeeb Rahman vs Muhammed Ismail regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-07-29
Duration
approximately-5 years 4 months
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mujeeb Rahman, claims that the defendant, Muhammed Ismail, is trying to evict him from a shop room he has been renting. The plaintiff has made considerable investments in the shop and seeks to continue conducting his business without disturbance.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from evicting him or making any disturbances to his business in the rented shop room.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from evicting the plaintiff and making any hindrance to the business.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from evicting him or making any disturbances to his business in the rented shop room.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was not challenged, and the court found it credible.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was not challenged, and the court found it credible.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of plaintiff remains unchallenged. There is no reason to disbelieve PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: (i) The defendant is restrained from forcefully evicting the plaintiff from the plaint schedule shop room...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mujeeb Rahman
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Ismail
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original rent deed dated 16/03/2020, Attested copy of GST registration certificate issued from Sales Tax Department, Original insurance certificate of United India Insurance Company, Original pass issued by Health Inspector, Thiruvananthapuram Corporation Office, Photographs
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.R.Meenakumaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S.S.Biju
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.Vysakh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to restrain defendant from evicting him and making disturbances in the shop room.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from making any disturbance to conduct business in the plaint scheduled shop room.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances, the plaintiffs are entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Rent Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the rental agreement between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Attested Copy of GST Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the business operations of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Insurance Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the insurance coverage for the business.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Pass from Health Inspector
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows compliance with health regulations for the business.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visually demonstrates the condition and setup of the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mujeeb Rahman vs Muhammed Ismail regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mujeeb Rahman vs Muhammed Ismail regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 03/16/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won