Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 39 of 2015

Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Muhammed Haji and Aminakkutty Umma, filed a suit for injunction against The Deputy Tahsildar, The Village Officer, and the State of Kerala represented by the District Collector. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing. The plaintiffs' counsel reported having no instructions to proceed with the case.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing. The plaintiffs' counsel reported having no instructions to proceed with the case.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Haji
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aminakkutty Umma
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Village Officer, Kurumbathoor Village Office
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala represented by the District Collector
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S. Hariharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Gopi Kadavath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit for injunction dismissed for default due to absence of plaintiffs.
Evidence:
Name of plaintiffs is called. Absent. No representation. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between M.P. Hajira et al vs Anapadikkal Pathummakkutty et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won