Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 31 OF 2013

Case between M.P. Hajira et al vs Anapadikkal Pathummakkutty et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by M.P. Hajira, filed for an injunction against the defendants, including Anapadikkal Pathummakkutty. The case was heard after several amendments and restorations.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.P. Hajira
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anappadikkal Muhammed Shafi
Party Age
20
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anapadikkal Shaharban
Party Age
17
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anapappadikkal Jabir
Party Age
16
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anapadikkal Jubairiya
Party Age
13
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anapadikkal Pathummakkutty
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.P. Ayishakkutty
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nabeesa
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anappadikkal Abdul Samad
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anappadikkal Salal
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vipin Chandrasekar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.K. Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.P. Hajira et al vs Anapadikkal Pathummakkutty et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between M.P. Hajira et al vs Anapadikkal Pathummakkutty et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won